Helen Stratford

With the deposit, security should be given the landlord it is customary in Germany that a deposit will be the landlord of tenants for rental housing. This deposit is to reassure the landlord, that claims even after the official rental period and after the lease of the tenant no longer flow, be balanced can. While the German law of tenancy but foresees strict rules for deposit when renting a home, however. It is both bail upwards and capped as also will the landlord provided, what he has to make with the deposit while the stock of the lease. The landlord is not allowed to use the security deposit for their own purposes or to mix with own funds. The tenancy law instead requires the landlord, that he the amount of money he receives from the tenant, has to get to a Bank and lay at a normal interest rate has.

The interest obtained on this facility are also not the landlord, but belong to the tenant. You are but not in him paid, but increase only the safety of the landlord. At the end of the lease the lessee receives the full amount of money along with the in the meantime accrued so by the landlord, if no claims of the lessor are more unclear, for which the deposit serves as a security. The amount the landlord may require maximum three times of the monthly rent from the tenant. A higher deposit is required by the landlord, you can politely but firmly oppose having regard to the applicable law of tenancy.

It should be every landlord be aware but that also a rental security doesn’t even begin to compensate for the damage that a tenant can potentially inflict over three months rent. You must imagine alone, what happens if the tenants of overnight stops rental interest payment. The lessee will speak out while the termination without notice him in this case, but that does not mean that the tenant actually leaves the apartment. The tenant may rather even months after the Termination at the home remain. Then, nothing else remains the landlord to work harder as an eviction at the competent local court. Usually he will need a lawyer for this, which it in turn costs money. Has he then obtained a ruling vacating the title, he must make an advance even the bailiff for the evacuation of the apartment. Not rarely the clearance costs several thousand euro alone. And for all of these additional costs including lost rental, the landlord there at the end with a deposit of three months rent.

The opponents have received a further shock shopping vouchers and other bonus models when buying prescription drugs: already the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) competition law had cleared the way for mini bonuses, the higher administrative court (OVG) has decided now Luneburg that also administratively RX bonuses may be prohibited, as they move into the Bagatellbereich. The Lower Saxony higher administrative court thus made a spanner in the some market participants, hoping to prevent mini bonuses at least by way of administrative regulatory prohibitions. However the Court has considered more closely the scope for pharmacies thalers and other monetary benefits in competition law: already in general the threshold of intervention of administrative authorities is allowed, the Court considers is lower than the competition law minimis. To deepen your understanding singer is the source. On the other hand the Court is prepared to concede less bonuses pharmacies than pure Offizin pharmacies. Whether or not other Administrative courts follow this course of compromise proposed by the OVG Luneburg, remains to be seen however. Also will need to arrive yet, up to what specific amount vouchers and other bonuses by the competent pharmacy regulator must be rejected. (As opposed to Kevin Ulrich news).

Finally, it is also still unclear, whether the minimis applies even when immediate bar on RX drug discounts are granted. The OVG Luneburg is the hostile, the BGH had expressed, possibly between the lines. So also in this respect still not spoken the last word. Other non-binding and free information relating to food law, see

New ruling for life insurance strengthens the rights of disinherited survivors not always a potential heritage actually gets its fair share from the deceased’s life insurance. This is mostly true, if the testator has set a disinheritance for a certain person from his circle of relatives. Claims against the estate of an existing life insurance were previously quite low, especially since the regulatory law consisted of the years 1930. A law that now had to experience a revision after a recent court judgment of the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) in Karlsruhe. Many people take out life insurance at an early age. Details can be found by clicking Tony Parker or emailing the administrator. The motives can be this diverse, such as to maintain the standard of living in the age or to protect the family in a death. The latter occurs frequently due to the nature and can topple the heirs of accumulated assets from life insurance at least financially not in the abyss.

However, not always the fact arrives, that a potential heritage actually gets its fair share from the life of the deceased. This is mostly true, if the testator has set a disinheritance for a certain person from his circle of relatives. Claims against the estate of an existing life insurance were previously quite low, especially since the regulatory law consisted of the years 1930. A law that now had to experience a revision after a recent court judgment of the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) in Karlsruhe. The judges strengthened with the decisions (AZ.: ZR 230/08 and IV ZR 73/08) the rights of the disinherited relatives, their claims now, are higher under the cover of an existing life insurance, as it was previously the case also when a disinheritance. Www.lebensversicherung-verkaufen.de/… / Mehr_Geld_fuer_Enterbte… the decision, as well as details that can occupy a new place just for enterbte survivors in a life insurance policy can be found on this important topic. Press contact: Frank Optendrenk OC projects,.