Shakespeare Man
But anyone, just a normal person would not doubt that relatives and friends of William Shakespeare were not allowed to put a picture on his grave, in which Shakespeare is absolutely impossible to be found. These people will not doubt and that the publishers of the First Folio, which already William Shakespeare was a genius, would not fit in this edition, a caricature of him. In this case both images are not referred to in many respects different from each other. And it is for such people the author continues, passing the time, more than obvious. Hearing every sane person can not scratch, and the eyes can not cut discrepancy pronouns, as used by Shakespeare in the sixth and eighth lines of this sonnet.
And if a man have the patience, he must realize that Shakespeare is so firmly pointed at the person's gender, and meetings with which he so craves. Therefore, incorrect translations of the sonnets, performed not only N. Gerbel, invented some sort of "queen", or S. Epifanova, playfully writing about "waiting for the sweet pleasures," but all the other translators, ambiguity in this regard. At the very ambiguity of Shakespeare here is something else – the reality human existence, location, which he, in fact, does not know. Moreover, it follows from the tenth row, and he does not know whether there was this man at all. Both of these factors expressed in Shakespeare's "Hamlet" the following words. …
Blessed, Whose blood and mind so gratifying merged, that he does not pipe in his fingers at Fortune, to play it. Whether a person is not a slave of passion – and I closed him in the middle of the heart, the heart of the heart. He was a man, a man in all, the likes I have not seen. (Translated by M. Lozinski) In short, otherwise this article would never end, in sonnet 44 W. Shakespeare wrote about his dream to find, meet a real man, a friend, a kindred spirit. The author takes assume such a person was. And he was not only a contemporary of Shakespeare, and even lived, even by the standards of the time, not on the edge of the world. And most importantly, he, like William Shakespeare said that after he has nobody ever told, and seems never to say: "The highest wisdom – to know thyself." Said these words, Galileo. And we can assume that he would not refuse to meet a man had mastered this wisdom that is from Shakespeare. Accordingly, the William Shakespeare, in sonnet 11 of that, what "living wisdom" and in sonnet 123 (for those who not only knows but also understands the English language) pointing to his knowledge of himself, which will remain with him (ever ) for centuries, could not rejoice in his meeting with a man who understood the full significance of this knowledge. Of course, everything written in this column is not certain. Question may already be subject to interpretation by the author the first line of Sonnet 44. After all, Shakespeare wrote as a first line Sonnet 85 of his "tongue-tied Muse", which is not true. And that last line of sonnet 44 translated accurately by the author himself does not deny. Undoubtedly there is only one. If William Shakespeare had a meeting with a man like him, they said they had only one thing – how to find the third.