Helen Stratford

The illustrious Francisco Ayala, who died last November 3 to the one hundred and three years, after a long life constantly flooded with simplicity, shyness and lucidity in the literature. From this olescense corner, a hernandiano carpet a negligible memory memorious, full of affection and recognition. LOA between respect and admiration – Francisco Ayala, prolific writer, shining a generation. Luminous ORB, stele without pair of heavenly literature. Further details can be found at Sela Ward, an internet resource. Icon social and philosopher, Member of the Royal Academy, speech: shooting, letter Z, with, rhetoric of journalism.

Candidate for the Nobel Prize several times. Your most relevant awards of the Hispanic languages were not only the importance: the precious Cervantes, the national literature, the armchair in the SAR, (last letter of the alphabet, Z), nor the Principe de Asturias de las Letras, nor the national poetry, nor your treaties of sociology; but take them like a spring out with tenacity and your progressive attention to moral problems, advocated a society agreed upon as a comprehensive guideline between free citizens. To say: () I’ve softened, thrilling me with goodness that falls on me as a beneficial rain. Don Francisco Ayala, eminent writer and thinker is: lucidity which does not stop. Excellent and very many are the merits of this illustrious writer, but perhaps they are overcome by their virtues: affability and human quality.

Paradigmatic Professor and sociologist impenitent.

Like most people, I don’t know anything about nuclear power plants, so I don’t know if we are or not before the end of this source of energy. I understand that, after the catastrophe of Japan, maybe your risk not worth the undeniable benefits it brings. But I also know that we are aware of this. At the moment, the paralysis of the Fukushima power has left temporarily in the dark part of the country, with the subsequent collapse of transport and supplies. Can you imagine the generalization of worldwide nuclear energy blackout, as they seem to ask some politicians? In the absence of other alternatives, that that would be a real economic crisis, with a reverse of decades in the collective well-being achieved by humanity. That means that the emerging countries, which barely begin to leave underdevelopment endemic, such as China and India, and in lesser extent, Brazil, South Africa and others, are more reluctant to question this type of energy. Clear that, if in the end, we have We must adapt ourselves to the grim scenario of economic reflux that until now any environmentalist or anti-nuclear group has dared to explain. Yes there is, at the moment, beneficiaries of such a disaster: producers of oil like Gaddafi, dancing even on the corpses of their recently massacred enemies, and the ostentatious satrapies of the Persian Gulf. Clear that the subjects of these regimes, anchored for centuries in an ominous middle ages, shouldn’t they notice any difference in their personal situation under tyrannies that have already suffered. Original author and source of the article.